Thursday, 17 November 2016

Week 9 [Seminar Notes] - Global Hollywood

Global Hollywood

- Hollywood as a global business.
- The global organisation of production, distribution, marketing and exhibition.
- The relationship between overseas audiences and Hollywood films.
- What are the arguments for and against viewing Hollywood as an agent of 'cultural imperialism'?
- In what ways are films: products engineered for success across global market and customised for and by local audiences?

Key Points from Miller Reading:
-  Miller et al. - Political economy perspective as a critique of Hollywood as part of transnational capitalism/US economic and cultural imperialism. Globalised production as part of international division of labour.

- To describe Hollywood's place in the global economy, they adapt the term 'New International Division of Labour' - Hollywood as part of a 'New International Division of Labour'

They emphasise:
- Globalisation as a labour process
- Hollywood's coordination of and authority over cultural labour markets overseas
- The role of the governments play in conjunction with multinational corporations 

- Hollywood operates like other industries, which have sought to lower costs by offshoring productions to areas with cheaper workforces, less regulation and weaker unions.

- "Hollywood's hegemony is built upon and sustained by the internal suppression of worker's rights, the explorations of a global division of labour, and the impact of colonialism on language."

Runaway Production
- First became a major trend in the 40s-50s. Hollywood productions made in the UK and European studios and on location in a range of global destinations. 

Benefits:
- Lower costs
- Government incentives
- Authenticity
- Touristic aspect to the viewing experience
- May help sell the product to local audiences

- License plating - e.g. Toronto or Vancouver as New York and other American cities

- Opposed by US craft unions in Southern California. Frequent topic of debate in the trade press.

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)
- Financed by New Lines Cinemas and Warner Bros.
- US financed, NZ production, international cast
- $25M at least in tax credits from NZ government
- Labour dispute --> NZ rewrites legislation to remove rights of workers on film productions.
- 266 days of shooting
- 99 sets built
- 6,750 domestic flights taken
- 1,800 rental cards hired
- $380,000 spent on coffee
- $1.5M spent on local food suppliers

For tax purposes, Hollywood films try to make their film qualify in other countries which contributed to the film's modes of production.


No comments:

Post a Comment